Review



human ace2 transcript variant 2  (OriGene)


Bioz Verified Symbol OriGene is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol OriGene manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    OriGene human ace2 transcript variant 2
    Microglia signature markers, P2RY12 and TMEM119 (in green) and cells nuclei (in blue) assessed by immunofluorescence staining, and representative western blot are presented in panel ( A-B ), respectively. Growth kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 (D614) on MDMi, mouse microglia (mMi), Vero E6 and Caco2 cells in ( C ). Relative expression of <t>ACE2</t> in MDMi by qPCR compared to Vero E6 and Hek-293T in ( D ). Level of ACE2 receptor in MDMi and mouse microglia compared to Caco2 and Vero E6 cells analysed by western blot shown in panel ( E ). Viral RNA levels from SARS-CoV-2 particles bound on cell surface expressed as N2 copies/well in ( F ) Intracellular luciferase level (LUC) delivered by pseudo-virus (PV) particle for SARS-CoV-2 in MDMi and Vero E6 compared to the non-glycoprotein control (NE) in ( G ). SARS-CoV-2 replication on MDMi (at MOI of 1) and Vero E6 (at MOI of 0.01) using SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus expressing ZsGreen fluorescent protein assessed directly under confocal microscopy at 3dpi are shown in panel ( H ). Data points are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA test with Sidak’s correction.
    Human Ace2 Transcript Variant 2, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 9 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+ace2+transcript+variant+2/bio_rxiv__2022__01__11__475947-199-1-10?v=OriGene
    Average 93 stars, based on 9 article reviews
    human ace2 transcript variant 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "SARS-CoV-2 drives NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human microglia through spike-ACE2 receptor interaction"

    Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 drives NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human microglia through spike-ACE2 receptor interaction

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2022.01.11.475947

    Microglia signature markers, P2RY12 and TMEM119 (in green) and cells nuclei (in blue) assessed by immunofluorescence staining, and representative western blot are presented in panel ( A-B ), respectively. Growth kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 (D614) on MDMi, mouse microglia (mMi), Vero E6 and Caco2 cells in ( C ). Relative expression of ACE2 in MDMi by qPCR compared to Vero E6 and Hek-293T in ( D ). Level of ACE2 receptor in MDMi and mouse microglia compared to Caco2 and Vero E6 cells analysed by western blot shown in panel ( E ). Viral RNA levels from SARS-CoV-2 particles bound on cell surface expressed as N2 copies/well in ( F ) Intracellular luciferase level (LUC) delivered by pseudo-virus (PV) particle for SARS-CoV-2 in MDMi and Vero E6 compared to the non-glycoprotein control (NE) in ( G ). SARS-CoV-2 replication on MDMi (at MOI of 1) and Vero E6 (at MOI of 0.01) using SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus expressing ZsGreen fluorescent protein assessed directly under confocal microscopy at 3dpi are shown in panel ( H ). Data points are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA test with Sidak’s correction.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Microglia signature markers, P2RY12 and TMEM119 (in green) and cells nuclei (in blue) assessed by immunofluorescence staining, and representative western blot are presented in panel ( A-B ), respectively. Growth kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 (D614) on MDMi, mouse microglia (mMi), Vero E6 and Caco2 cells in ( C ). Relative expression of ACE2 in MDMi by qPCR compared to Vero E6 and Hek-293T in ( D ). Level of ACE2 receptor in MDMi and mouse microglia compared to Caco2 and Vero E6 cells analysed by western blot shown in panel ( E ). Viral RNA levels from SARS-CoV-2 particles bound on cell surface expressed as N2 copies/well in ( F ) Intracellular luciferase level (LUC) delivered by pseudo-virus (PV) particle for SARS-CoV-2 in MDMi and Vero E6 compared to the non-glycoprotein control (NE) in ( G ). SARS-CoV-2 replication on MDMi (at MOI of 1) and Vero E6 (at MOI of 0.01) using SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus expressing ZsGreen fluorescent protein assessed directly under confocal microscopy at 3dpi are shown in panel ( H ). Data points are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA test with Sidak’s correction.

    Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Luciferase, Confocal Microscopy

    Relative of infectivity determined by Plaque Reduction Neutralisation Test (PRNT) to verify the neutralizing level of a soluble receptor hACE2-FcM compared to a non-related SARS-CoV-2 receptor NCAM-FcM (top) and the inhibitory concentration (IC50) (bottom) ( A ). Spike–mediated IL-1β secretion (supernatant) in vehicle (untreated) or LPS-primed MDMIs exposed to S-clamp (S; 10-50 μg) in presence or absence of the soluble hACE2-FcM protein. ATP (5 mM) treatment for 1 hour was used as a positive control ( B ). Inhibition of spike-mediated IL-1β secretion by ACE2 inhibition with MLN-4760 (1 or 10 μM) ( C ). Validation of low endotoxin anti-ACE2 (3E8) and anti-Hemagglutinin from influenza A H3 (CO5) proteins by SDS-PAGE and ELISA ( D-E ). Effect of 3E8 in blocking cells activation by spike protein in pre-treatment of LPS-primed MDMi exposed to S-clamp ( F ). Data are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Relative of infectivity determined by Plaque Reduction Neutralisation Test (PRNT) to verify the neutralizing level of a soluble receptor hACE2-FcM compared to a non-related SARS-CoV-2 receptor NCAM-FcM (top) and the inhibitory concentration (IC50) (bottom) ( A ). Spike–mediated IL-1β secretion (supernatant) in vehicle (untreated) or LPS-primed MDMIs exposed to S-clamp (S; 10-50 μg) in presence or absence of the soluble hACE2-FcM protein. ATP (5 mM) treatment for 1 hour was used as a positive control ( B ). Inhibition of spike-mediated IL-1β secretion by ACE2 inhibition with MLN-4760 (1 or 10 μM) ( C ). Validation of low endotoxin anti-ACE2 (3E8) and anti-Hemagglutinin from influenza A H3 (CO5) proteins by SDS-PAGE and ELISA ( D-E ). Effect of 3E8 in blocking cells activation by spike protein in pre-treatment of LPS-primed MDMi exposed to S-clamp ( F ). Data are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test.

    Techniques Used: Infection, Concentration Assay, Positive Control, Inhibition, SDS Page, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Blocking Assay, Activation Assay



    Similar Products

    93
    OriGene human ace2 transcript variant 2
    Microglia signature markers, P2RY12 and TMEM119 (in green) and cells nuclei (in blue) assessed by immunofluorescence staining, and representative western blot are presented in panel ( A-B ), respectively. Growth kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 (D614) on MDMi, mouse microglia (mMi), Vero E6 and Caco2 cells in ( C ). Relative expression of <t>ACE2</t> in MDMi by qPCR compared to Vero E6 and Hek-293T in ( D ). Level of ACE2 receptor in MDMi and mouse microglia compared to Caco2 and Vero E6 cells analysed by western blot shown in panel ( E ). Viral RNA levels from SARS-CoV-2 particles bound on cell surface expressed as N2 copies/well in ( F ) Intracellular luciferase level (LUC) delivered by pseudo-virus (PV) particle for SARS-CoV-2 in MDMi and Vero E6 compared to the non-glycoprotein control (NE) in ( G ). SARS-CoV-2 replication on MDMi (at MOI of 1) and Vero E6 (at MOI of 0.01) using SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus expressing ZsGreen fluorescent protein assessed directly under confocal microscopy at 3dpi are shown in panel ( H ). Data points are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA test with Sidak’s correction.
    Human Ace2 Transcript Variant 2, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+ace2+transcript+variant+2/bio_rxiv__2022__01__11__475947-199-1-10?v=OriGene
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human ace2 transcript variant 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Microglia signature markers, P2RY12 and TMEM119 (in green) and cells nuclei (in blue) assessed by immunofluorescence staining, and representative western blot are presented in panel ( A-B ), respectively. Growth kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 (D614) on MDMi, mouse microglia (mMi), Vero E6 and Caco2 cells in ( C ). Relative expression of ACE2 in MDMi by qPCR compared to Vero E6 and Hek-293T in ( D ). Level of ACE2 receptor in MDMi and mouse microglia compared to Caco2 and Vero E6 cells analysed by western blot shown in panel ( E ). Viral RNA levels from SARS-CoV-2 particles bound on cell surface expressed as N2 copies/well in ( F ) Intracellular luciferase level (LUC) delivered by pseudo-virus (PV) particle for SARS-CoV-2 in MDMi and Vero E6 compared to the non-glycoprotein control (NE) in ( G ). SARS-CoV-2 replication on MDMi (at MOI of 1) and Vero E6 (at MOI of 0.01) using SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus expressing ZsGreen fluorescent protein assessed directly under confocal microscopy at 3dpi are shown in panel ( H ). Data points are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA test with Sidak’s correction.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 drives NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human microglia through spike-ACE2 receptor interaction

    doi: 10.1101/2022.01.11.475947

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Microglia signature markers, P2RY12 and TMEM119 (in green) and cells nuclei (in blue) assessed by immunofluorescence staining, and representative western blot are presented in panel ( A-B ), respectively. Growth kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 (D614) on MDMi, mouse microglia (mMi), Vero E6 and Caco2 cells in ( C ). Relative expression of ACE2 in MDMi by qPCR compared to Vero E6 and Hek-293T in ( D ). Level of ACE2 receptor in MDMi and mouse microglia compared to Caco2 and Vero E6 cells analysed by western blot shown in panel ( E ). Viral RNA levels from SARS-CoV-2 particles bound on cell surface expressed as N2 copies/well in ( F ) Intracellular luciferase level (LUC) delivered by pseudo-virus (PV) particle for SARS-CoV-2 in MDMi and Vero E6 compared to the non-glycoprotein control (NE) in ( G ). SARS-CoV-2 replication on MDMi (at MOI of 1) and Vero E6 (at MOI of 0.01) using SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus expressing ZsGreen fluorescent protein assessed directly under confocal microscopy at 3dpi are shown in panel ( H ). Data points are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA test with Sidak’s correction.

    Article Snippet: The human ACE2 transcript variant 2 was amplified using the OriGene primer set Forward: 5’-TCC ATT GGT CTT CTG TCA CCC G-3’ and Reverse: 5’-AGA CCA TCC ACC TCC ACT TCT C-3’.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Luciferase, Confocal Microscopy

    Relative of infectivity determined by Plaque Reduction Neutralisation Test (PRNT) to verify the neutralizing level of a soluble receptor hACE2-FcM compared to a non-related SARS-CoV-2 receptor NCAM-FcM (top) and the inhibitory concentration (IC50) (bottom) ( A ). Spike–mediated IL-1β secretion (supernatant) in vehicle (untreated) or LPS-primed MDMIs exposed to S-clamp (S; 10-50 μg) in presence or absence of the soluble hACE2-FcM protein. ATP (5 mM) treatment for 1 hour was used as a positive control ( B ). Inhibition of spike-mediated IL-1β secretion by ACE2 inhibition with MLN-4760 (1 or 10 μM) ( C ). Validation of low endotoxin anti-ACE2 (3E8) and anti-Hemagglutinin from influenza A H3 (CO5) proteins by SDS-PAGE and ELISA ( D-E ). Effect of 3E8 in blocking cells activation by spike protein in pre-treatment of LPS-primed MDMi exposed to S-clamp ( F ). Data are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 drives NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human microglia through spike-ACE2 receptor interaction

    doi: 10.1101/2022.01.11.475947

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Relative of infectivity determined by Plaque Reduction Neutralisation Test (PRNT) to verify the neutralizing level of a soluble receptor hACE2-FcM compared to a non-related SARS-CoV-2 receptor NCAM-FcM (top) and the inhibitory concentration (IC50) (bottom) ( A ). Spike–mediated IL-1β secretion (supernatant) in vehicle (untreated) or LPS-primed MDMIs exposed to S-clamp (S; 10-50 μg) in presence or absence of the soluble hACE2-FcM protein. ATP (5 mM) treatment for 1 hour was used as a positive control ( B ). Inhibition of spike-mediated IL-1β secretion by ACE2 inhibition with MLN-4760 (1 or 10 μM) ( C ). Validation of low endotoxin anti-ACE2 (3E8) and anti-Hemagglutinin from influenza A H3 (CO5) proteins by SDS-PAGE and ELISA ( D-E ). Effect of 3E8 in blocking cells activation by spike protein in pre-treatment of LPS-primed MDMi exposed to S-clamp ( F ). Data are means + SEM from at least three different donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test.

    Article Snippet: The human ACE2 transcript variant 2 was amplified using the OriGene primer set Forward: 5’-TCC ATT GGT CTT CTG TCA CCC G-3’ and Reverse: 5’-AGA CCA TCC ACC TCC ACT TCT C-3’.

    Techniques: Infection, Concentration Assay, Positive Control, Inhibition, SDS Page, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Blocking Assay, Activation Assay